<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?>

<feed xmlns="http://purl.org/atom/ns#" version="0.3" xml:lang="en-US">
<link href="https://www.blogger.com/atom/12483901" rel="service.post" title="Safe Families" type="application/atom+xml"/>
<link href="https://www.blogger.com/atom/12483901" rel="service.feed" title="Safe Families" type="application/atom+xml"/>
<title mode="escaped" type="text/html">Safe Families</title>
<tagline mode="escaped" type="text/html">Safe Personal Care &amp; Nutritionals</tagline>
<link href="http://www.dblsundog.net/Blog" rel="alternate" title="Safe Families" type="text/html"/>
<id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12483901</id>
<modified>2007-01-02T12:38:44Z</modified>
<generator url="http://www.blogger.com/" version="6.72">Blogger</generator>
<info mode="xml" type="text/html">
<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">This is an Atom formatted XML site feed. It is intended to be viewed in a Newsreader or syndicated to another site. Please visit the <a href="http://help.blogger.com/bin/answer.py?answer=697">Blogger Help</a> for more info.</div>
</info>
<convertLineBreaks xmlns="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">true</convertLineBreaks>
<entry xmlns="http://purl.org/atom/ns#">
<link href="https://www.blogger.com/atom/12483901/116774152427003340" rel="service.edit" title="Are Antibiotics Killing You?" type="application/atom+xml"/>
<link href="http://www.bladder--infection.com" rel="related" title="Are Antibiotics Killing You?" type="text/html"/>
<author>
<name>Uplander</name>
</author>
<issued>2007-01-02T07:37:00-05:00</issued>
<modified>2007-01-02T12:38:44Z</modified>
<created>2007-01-02T12:38:44Z</created>
<link href="http://www.dblsundog.net/Blog/2007/01/are-antibiotics-killing-you.html" rel="alternate" title="Are Antibiotics Killing You?" type="text/html"/>
<id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12483901.post-116774152427003340</id>
<title mode="escaped" type="text/html">Are Antibiotics Killing You?</title>
<content type="application/xhtml+xml" xml:base="http://www.dblsundog.net/Blog" xml:space="preserve">
<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Are Antibiotics Killing You?<br/>
<br/>by John Bremner</p>
<p>
<br/>Thank god for doctors and for antibiotics. They save millions of lives every year, but there is a dark side to the use of antibiotics that is not quite so well known. For example, did you know that there is a commonly used antibiotic that can kill, like ecstasy, on the very first dose you take? </p>
<p>
<br/>The trouble with antibiotics is that they are just so good at what they do, that we start begging for antibiotics as soon as we get ill, and doctors who are already under huge pressures at work just dont have the time to argue. Its easier to give in, and as likely as not the antibiotic will do the job, and not kill you.</p>
<p>
<br/>Side-effects<br/>
<br/>However, most antibiotics have some adverse effects, and the side-effects of some commonly used antibiotics can be very dangerous. Plus, the bugs that typically affect us are growing more and more resistant to antibiotics, with the result that there are now E.coli bugs, like the potentially deadly strain, 0157:H7 that are resistant to almost everything medically available, including broad-spectrum antibiotics.</p>
<p>
<br/>If thats not enough to make you think twice, there is also the effect that antibiotics have on your immune system. When your body defeats an attack by a bug it becomes stronger, and will probably always defeat that bug. However, every time you take a course of antibiotics, you are taking away your immune systems power. </p>
<p>
<br/>The dilemma is that you may need to take them to save your life, for example if your kidney is compromised by a bacterial infection. But once youve taken broad-spectrum antibiotics, and they no longer work for you, your options become extremely limited. Doctors end up having to prescribe huge doses of antibiotics with cumulative side-effects so dangerous that you may suffer for the rest of your life as a result. Not to mention the damage to your immune system.</p>
<p>
<br/>Cost of Treatment and How you are Affected<br/>
<br/>The bugs that affect us mutate so often that no two infections are the same. This means that antibiotics should ideally be tested against a laboratory grown culture of your infection to see which will be most effective. Using a targeted antibiotic that has been tested to see if it kills your particular infection is like using a magic bullet. It will be highly effective, and have fewer side-effects than a broad-spectrum antibiotic. </p>
<p>
<br/>However, this is expensive. It is cheaper for the doctor to prescribe an antibiotic that is known to be fairly effective against most typical infections that cause similar symptoms to those you are experiencing. The results wont be as good as a targeted antibiotic, the side-effects will probably be worse, and one in five people will probably still have the infection after six weeks because of this strategy, but its a less expensive option for the NHS than having to pay for detailed lab tests. Its also faster to treat you this way, so if it works for you, you are one less patient to have to deal with next week.</p>
<p>
<br/>The Dangers<br/>
<br/>As an example of the dangers of broad-spectrum treatment, some of the side-effects of the fluoroquinolene based antibiotics often used against resistant infections include joint pain and tendon tearing, fluorodosis (fluorine poisoning) heart attack, heart murmur, palpitations, angina, cerebral thrombosis, sudden death on first dose, liver failure, jaundice, gastrointestinal bleeding, diarrhoea, ulcerative colitis, burst intestine, vomiting, constipation, irritable bowel syndrome, anaphylactic shock, skin dying or falling off, dermatitis, vasculitis, angioedema, swelling of the lips, eyes, or face, fever, chills, lupus, and going purple. </p>
<p>
<br/>According to Drug Watch, adverse affects are reported by 35% of women using antibiotics. While its true that most people dont have the more severe side-effects, if you are one of the unlucky ones, you can be permanently damaged. Fluorodosis, for example, causes severe joint pains, as your body tries to deal with the excess fluorine in your system by depositing it on your bones and joints. Its also very difficult to treat, and doctors often mistake the symptoms for arthritis.</p>
<p>
<br/>M. H. Dahir  a Pharmaceutical Association Chairman, says in his article The Dangers of Indomethacin:<br/>
<br/>"If a bacterium is responsible, it is extremely important for the doctor to know which specific bug is causing the trouble so that he can treat it with the right drug. Using a broad-spectrum antibiotic is a cop-out. It is the lazy way to do medicine, since it allows the doctor to cut out the time necessary to do a proper laboratory work-up and diagnosis." </p>
<p>
<br/>What to do if you get adverse reactions...<br/>
<br/>If, after starting a course of antibiotic treatment, you start to get unusual symptoms, such as fever, nausea, a sudden rash, intense itching, stiffness, severe abdominal pain, or swelling, stop taking the antibiotic, and consult your doctor immediately. </p>
<p>
<br/>The very worst side-effects happen when you are allergic to an antibiotic. Your doctor should be able to provide a non-related antibiotic that wont produce the same adverse reaction.</p>
<p>
<br/>You can also look for alternative therapies. For example, statistics show that the sugar-related product D-Mannose (available from <a href="http://www.sweet-cures.com" target="_blank">www.sweet-cures.com</a>) is more effective than most antibiotics for the majority of urinary tract infections, and it works against antibiotic resistant strains of E.coli  the cause of most recurrent cystitis infections. It is also claimed to be totally harmless, even for babies.</p>
<p>
<br/>And the list goes on:</p>
<p>
<br/> For throat infections, traditional remedies such as gargling with alcohol are often as effective as any antibiotic. </p>
<p>
<br/> Manuka honey from New Zealand, available from most health food stores, is known to kill the Helicobacter pylori bug that causes duodenal or stomach ulcers.</p>
<p>
<br/> Galangal has been used since the times of St. Hildegard of Bingen for catarrh, and it doesnt give you a dry mouth or other diuretic side-effects like Sudafed.</p>
<p>
<br/> Salt water is as good a decongestant as most commercially available nasal sprays.</p>
<p>
<br/> Cider vinegar and a diet change can deal with arthritis more efficiently than most drugs, and instead of side-effects, you get healthy. </p>
<p>
<br/> For depression, St Johns Wort is non-addictive, unlike Prozac, and there are fewer side-effects.</p>
<p>
<br/> Asthmatic or wheezy? Getting a cold? Mix some black cumin seeds with honey and garlic. Used since the times of the Pharaohs, this is cheaper and more effective than any medical preparation, and wont cause brain tumours, unlike some of the medical decongestants available.</p>
<p>
<br/>The fact is that most of the time, no matter what ailment you are suffering from, you can do better than taking the standard prescription. And think of the money youll save the health service, and all the time youll save your doctor.</p>
<p>
<br/>Oops, sorry to inform you that your operation was unnecessary<br/>
<br/>Some people are locked into the idea that the doctor knows best, but although this may sometimes be true, medical training often ignores the huge legacy of knowledge from folk medicine and from other cultures, which were in use long before the fairly recent science of medicine came into being. How many surgeons would tell you to take a pint of olive oil and the juice of three lemons (slowly or youll vomit it back up) to get rid of gallstones? Or would they rather do a bladderectomy? </p>
<p>
<br/>In the same way, most trips to the hospital or doctor can be dispensed with. </p>
<p>
<br/>It is up to ourselves to take charge of our own health. Some solid research can make us experts in our own conditions and allow us to take charge of our own treatment.</p>
<p>
<br/>----------<br/>
<br/>More info: John Bremner<br/>
<br/>email: <a href="mailto:john@bladder--infection.com">john@bladder--infection.com</a>
<br/>
<br/>
<a href="http://www.bladder--infection.com" target="_blank">www.bladder--infection.com</a>
<br/>
<br/>+44 (0) 1904-340916</p>
<p>
<br/>John Bremner is an expert on bladder infections, UTIs and cystitis. He is controverssial, highly informed, not afraid to speak out, and available for interview. You can contact him on email: <a href="mailto:john@bladder--infection.com">john@bladder--infection.com</a>
<br/>
<br/>
<a href="http://www.bladder--infection.com" target="_blank">www.bladder--infection.com</a>
<br/>
<br/>+44 (0) 1904-340916</p>
</div>
</content>
<draft xmlns="http://purl.org/atom-blog/ns#">false</draft>
</entry>
<entry xmlns="http://purl.org/atom/ns#">
<link href="https://www.blogger.com/atom/12483901/112441309398148794" rel="service.edit" title="Food for thought: Crop diversity is dying" type="application/atom+xml"/>
<author>
<name>Uplander</name>
</author>
<issued>2005-08-18T20:57:00-04:00</issued>
<modified>2005-08-19T00:58:13Z</modified>
<created>2005-08-19T00:58:13Z</created>
<link href="http://www.dblsundog.net/Blog/2005/08/food-for-thought-crop-diversity-is.html" rel="alternate" title="Food for thought: Crop diversity is dying" type="text/html"/>
<id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12483901.post-112441309398148794</id>
<title mode="escaped" type="text/html">Food for thought: Crop diversity is dying</title>
<content type="application/xhtml+xml" xml:base="http://www.dblsundog.net/Blog" xml:space="preserve">
<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">Food for thought: Crop diversity is dying<br/>By Elisabeth Rosenthal International Herald<br/>Tribune<br/>THURSDAY, AUGUST 18, 2005<br/>
<br/>
<br/>ROME José Esquinas-Alcázar regards the corn laid<br/>out in rows with the love and admiration that<br/>sommeliers reserve for bottles in a fine wine cellar.<br/>To the untrained eye, it is a collection of misshapen<br/>ears: Long, short, blue, yellow, white, spotted,<br/>covered in dirt.<br/>
<br/>"Look at this beauty!" he exclaims. "Some are good<br/>for starch, some for popcorn. Some grow in the cold.<br/>Some are good fried, some broiled. The taste for<br/>each is completely different.<br/>
<br/>"Diversity is what makes us happy, gives us choice<br/>and keeps us free. And it's tragic because this is<br/>what we are losing."<br/>
<br/>Esquinas, a top official at the UN Food and<br/>Agriculture Organization in Rome, has spent<br/>decades campaigning to preserve plants that are<br/>used for food, which are becoming extinct at an<br/>alarming rate.<br/>
<br/>Last year, his efforts culminated in the adoption of<br/>the United Nations Treaty on Plant Genetic<br/>Resources for Food and Agriculture, which requires<br/>countries to preserve existing crops and creates an<br/>international system for sharing crops and plant<br/>genes.<br/>
<br/>But much has already been lost.<br/>
<br/>Historically, humans utilized more than 7,000 plant<br/>species to meet their basic food needs, Esquinas<br/>says. Today, due to the limitations of modern large-<br/>scale, mechanized farming, only 150 plant species<br/>are under cultivation, and the majority of humans<br/>live on only 12 plant species, according to research<br/>by the Food and Agriculture Organization.<br/>
<br/>Most types of food, for example the tomato, consist<br/>of several different species, and each species may<br/>contain dozens, if not hundreds, of varieties. In the<br/>last century, dozens of varieties of corn, wheat and<br/>potato have disappeared.<br/>
<br/>"This is not nearly as sexy as a panda going extinct,<br/>but the losses are far more dangerous for our<br/>survival," Esquinas said in his office on the outskirts<br/>of Rome.<br/>
<br/>The result for humans is a more one-dimensional<br/>diet, where tomatoes look and taste the same and<br/>only one type of corn or potato may be available on<br/>supermarket shelves.<br/>
<br/>The consequences are potentially dire: As species<br/>drop out, the world loses the genetic diversity that<br/>has allowed farmers and scientists to breed new<br/>types of seed crops that can adapt to changing<br/>conditions - a hotter, drier growing season, for<br/>example, or the invasion of a new bacterial pest.<br/>
<br/>"If you have climate change or environmental<br/>change, you need to search through those plants to<br/>find one that is adapted to the new conditions," he<br/>said.<br/>
<br/>The loss of food plant species is directly related to<br/>the 20th century "green revolution," in which<br/>farmers adopted streamlined agricultural techniques<br/>to increase production of food. To maximize crop<br/>yields, they chose a few high-yield, uniform crops<br/>that grew predictably and could be planted and<br/>harvested mechanically. With irrigation,<br/>mechanization, fertilizers and pesticides at their<br/>disposal, farmers in developed nations were able to<br/>maintain control over growing conditions.<br/>
<br/>The result was plentiful food, but far less variety in<br/>the types of seeds and foods planted - which,<br/>occasionally, led to disastrous vulnerability. In 1970,<br/>for example, more than half of the corn crop in the<br/>southern United States succumbed to an unusual<br/>fungus because the corn was all grown from one<br/>seed type that is particularly susceptible to that<br/>disease.<br/>
<br/>While modern farmers tend to favor a few crops,<br/>traditional small-scale farmers took the opposite<br/>approach: maintaining and growing a wide variety of<br/>crops and seeds in order to survive, since they had<br/>little control over things like soil, weather, and pests.<br/>To ensure there was food on the table, their best bet<br/>was to plant a range of crops - some that thrived in<br/>heat and others that could withstand cold, for<br/>example.<br/>
<br/>Their storehouses and fields were (and are) the<br/>world's gold mine of plant genetic resources. Indeed,<br/>after the unusual fungus damaged the U.S. corn crop<br/>in 1970, scientists modified the U.S. corn seed with a<br/>gene borrowed from a type of African maize that was<br/>resistant to the fungus.<br/>
<br/>But this kind of resource is being lost as land is<br/>urbanized and as traditional farming practices in<br/>Latin America and Africa fall by the wayside.<br/>
<br/>Esquinas ticks off crops that have disappeared from<br/>the world's fields: Of the nearly 8,000 varieties of<br/>apple that grew in the United States at the turn of<br/>the century, more than 95 percent no longer exist. In<br/>Mexico, only 20 percent of the corn types recorded<br/>in 1930 can now be found. Only 10 percent of the<br/>10,000 wheat varieties grown in China in 1949<br/>remain in use.<br/>
<br/>Paying homage to the bounty and variety of nature<br/>has been a lifelong obsession for Esquinas, who grew<br/>up in a Spanish family that had farmed for<br/>generations. In the late 1960s, he did his doctoral<br/>research on genetic diversity of the Spanish melon,<br/>traveling by bus, foot and horse to collect 370<br/>varieties of seed from small farmers all over Spain.<br/>
<br/>Later, he grew the fruits and characterized the<br/>physical and chemical differences between melon<br/>types, creating a melon family tree.<br/>
<br/>More recently, at the anthropological museum in<br/>Cairo, he focused on a particular treasure from the<br/>tomb of King Tut, one that other tourists might have<br/>overlooked among the precious trinkets and gold: a<br/>small partitioned box holding more than 25 varieties<br/>of barley seed, each in its own compartment.<br/>
<br/>"They recognized that these seeds were a<br/>treasure," Esquinas says. "My conclusion as a plant<br/>geneticist is that he was buried with all these seeds<br/>because he didn't know what kind of soil and<br/>humidity or rain there would be in the underworld!"<br/>
<br/>Today, Esquinas's mission is to ensure that food<br/>plants are protected, both in "banks" and in the<br/>field, so that the bounty of nature - and the genetic<br/>diversity behind it - is preserved.<br/>
<br/>Since many crops have already disappeared in the<br/>West, farmers in the developing world must be<br/>compensated for maintaining and sharing their plant<br/>varieties, he says.<br/>
<br/>When Esquinas was collecting melon seeds, he<br/>accompanied a farmer to a remote village by<br/>donkey, where he was presented with seeds for a<br/>melon that the farmer insisted was exceptionally<br/>hearty.<br/>
<br/>When he analyzed the seed back in the lab, he<br/>discovered that it was resistant to many diseases,<br/>and genes from that melon have since been<br/>introduced into numerous commercial fruits.<br/>
<br/>Various institutes and universities around the world<br/>maintain seed collections. The French National<br/>Institute for Agricultural Research, for example,<br/>maintains 4,000 lines of maize. But Esquinas says<br/>that a more systematic effort is needed.<br/>
<br/>Maintaining diversity in food is not just about<br/>survival, but also about the quality of life, and people<br/>must be taught to appreciate it, he said.<br/>
<br/>In the past two decades, "People have learned to<br/>drink wine - to notice the distinctions: this one is<br/>smoky or sweet and that one aromatic," he said.<br/>"But all food has variety - rice has it, potatoes have<br/>it. You don't know a good wine the first time you<br/>drink. We need to develop our taste for foods like<br/>these, too."<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
<br/> Copyright © 2005 The International Herald Tribune<br/> | www.iht.com</div>
</content>
<draft xmlns="http://purl.org/atom-blog/ns#">false</draft>
</entry>
<entry xmlns="http://purl.org/atom/ns#">
<link href="https://www.blogger.com/atom/12483901/112246959037964379" rel="service.edit" title="The Challenge of Leadership" type="application/atom+xml"/>
<author>
<name>Uplander</name>
</author>
<issued>2005-07-27T09:05:00-04:00</issued>
<modified>2005-07-27T13:06:30Z</modified>
<created>2005-07-27T13:06:30Z</created>
<link href="http://www.dblsundog.net/Blog/2005/07/challenge-of-leadership.html" rel="alternate" title="The Challenge of Leadership" type="text/html"/>
<id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12483901.post-112246959037964379</id>
<title mode="escaped" type="text/html">The Challenge of Leadership</title>
<content type="application/xhtml+xml" xml:base="http://www.dblsundog.net/Blog" xml:space="preserve">
<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">The Challenge of Leadership<br/>
<br/>Benjamin Franklin played a lot of roles, but primarily,<br/>you'd have to call him a thinker. He knew how to think.<br/>And that led him to act. In our current lingo, we could say<br/>that he knew how to think outside the box. His approach<br/>to solving problems wasn't restricted to the solutions that<br/>were already on the table. He could come up with new<br/>solutions. That's how he came to be an inventor. You have<br/>to think up the solution in your mind before you create the<br/>solution.<br/>
<br/>Franklin knew to think in simple terms. He needed to<br/>reach the books on the high shelf so he invented an<br/>extension rod that operated with a simple pull string. You<br/>push the extension rod up to the book you wanted, pull the<br/>string and the clamp would hold the book. Very simple.<br/>
<br/>Franklin didn't invent street lights, although he's given<br/>credit for it on occasion. But in his day, if you had to be<br/>out on the streets at night, you carried your own light.<br/>Since everybody was accustomed to carrying their own<br/>light, nobody saw the need to put lights on the streets.<br/>Carrying a light was not the best solution, but it was the<br/>solution that everyone was used to.<br/>
<br/>And Franklin correctly anticipated that a recommendation<br/>to the town council to light the streets at night would<br/>cause a big fuss about who would pay for all that expense.<br/>And who needed them anyway since everyone already<br/>had their own light to carry.<br/>
<br/>So Franklin had a new thought. He bought a lamp and<br/>hung it on a pole outside his house. Before long a<br/>neighbor down the street got a light and hung it on a pole<br/>outside his own house. The idea caught on and soon the<br/>city council took on the idea of street lights for the town.<br/>They bought Ben Franklin's idea without him ever saying<br/>a word.<br/>
<br/>This is what we call leading by example.</div>
</content>
<draft xmlns="http://purl.org/atom-blog/ns#">false</draft>
</entry>
<entry xmlns="http://purl.org/atom/ns#">
<link href="https://www.blogger.com/atom/12483901/111928650840433402" rel="service.edit" title="Know Thy Food Label" type="application/atom+xml"/>
<author>
<name>Uplander</name>
</author>
<issued>2005-06-20T12:54:00-04:00</issued>
<modified>2005-06-20T17:01:07Z</modified>
<created>2005-06-20T16:55:08Z</created>
<link href="http://www.dblsundog.net/Blog/2005/06/know-thy-food-label.html" rel="alternate" title="Know Thy Food Label" type="text/html"/>
<id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12483901.post-111928650840433402</id>
<title mode="escaped" type="text/html">Know Thy Food Label</title>
<content type="application/xhtml+xml" xml:base="http://www.dblsundog.net/Blog" xml:space="preserve">
<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">Know Thy Food Label <br/>by C. R. Ellsworth<br/> <br/> <br/>Whether you're concerned about cancer,<br/>cardiovascular disease, diabetes, or simply losing<br/>weight, you want to eat a healthy diet and focus<br/>on foods that are high in vitamins, minerals, and<br/>phytonutrients, and balanced in fats, carbs,<br/>proteins. <br/>
<br/>There is only one way to incorporate healthy foods<br/>into our diet and that is to make the decision to<br/>do it! Practical information about the nutrition<br/>and safety of the foods we consume is absolutely<br/>vital in making this decision. <br/>
<br/>One way to learn more about what we eat, is to<br/>snoop around the supermarket. Check-out package<br/>labels to see what manufactures are adding (or<br/>removing) from the foods we eat. Read the<br/>information on the package and start making<br/>comparisons to determine which foods are the best<br/>for YOU. Know about nutritional labeling and the<br/>sometimes sneaky ways that manufacturers have of<br/>hiding what is in the food. Know and understand <br/>ingredient declarations, how they are used, and<br/>what a few of the "technical" terms mean. Are the<br/>unfamiliar ingredients good or bad for your<br/>health? <br/>
<br/>Since 1994 food manufacturers have been required<br/>by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to<br/>include food labels (or Nutrition Facts labels) on<br/>product packaging so that consumers have accurate<br/>nutritional information about the food they<br/>purchase. But food labels are more than just a<br/>federal requirement – once you understand the<br/>information they provide, you can use food labels<br/>as a guide to planning healthier meals and<br/>snacks. <br/>
<br/>Food labels are required on almost all foods,<br/>except those that don't provide many nutrients<br/>such as coffee, alcohol and spices. Although some<br/>restaurants provide information about the food<br/>they serve, they aren't required to have labels.<br/>The FDA recommends that sellers provide<br/>nutritional information on produce, meat, poultry<br/>and seafood, but it's strictly voluntary. <br/>
<br/>What Is a Serving? <br/>
<br/>At the top of a food label under Nutrition Facts,<br/>you'll see the serving size and the number of<br/>servings in the package. The rest of the nutrition<br/>information in the label is based on one serving. <br/>
<br/>Calories, Calories From Fat and Percent Daily<br/>Values <br/>
<br/>This part of a food label provides the calories<br/>per serving and the calories that come from fat.<br/>If you need to know the total number of calories<br/>you eat every day or the number of calories that<br/>come from fat, this section provides that<br/>information. Remember that this part of the label<br/>doesn't tell you whether you are eating saturated<br/>or unsaturated fat. <br/>
<br/>On the right side of a food label, you'll see a<br/>column that lists percentages. These percentages<br/>refer to the percent daily values (%DV). Percent<br/>daily values tell you how much of something,<br/>whether it's fat, sugar or vitamin A, one serving<br/>will give you compared to how much you need for<br/>the entire day. It will help you gauge the<br/>percentage of a nutrient requirement met by one<br/>serving of the product. One way to use this<br/>section of the label is when you comparison shop.<br/>For example, if you're concerned with sodium, you<br/>can look at two foods and choose the food with the<br/>lower % DV. Are you trying to eat a low-fat diet?<br/>Look for foods that have a lower percent daily<br/>value of fat. <br/>
<br/>The %DV is based on how much or how little of the<br/>key nutrients you should eat whether you eat 2,000<br/>or 2,500 calories a day. So if you eat a<br/>2,000-calorie diet, you should eat less than 65<br/>grams of fat in all the foods you eat for the day.<br/>If you're eating 12 grams of fat in your one<br/>serving of macaroni and cheese (remember that's<br/>one cup), you can calculate how much fat you have<br/>left for the day. You can use the bottom part of<br/>the food label in white to compare what you are<br/>eating to the % DV you're allowed for that<br/>nutrient, whether it's fat, sodium or fiber. If<br/>you need more or less than 2,000 or 2,500<br/>calories, you'll need to adjust this accordingly. <br/>
<br/>Nutrients <br/>
<br/>Fat, Sugar, Sodium and Carbohydrate <br/>
<br/>The sections on a food label shows the name of a<br/>nutrient and the amount of that nutrient provided<br/>by one serving of food. You may need to know this<br/>information, especially if you have high blood<br/>pressure, diabetes or are eating a diet that<br/>restricts certain nutrients such as sodium or<br/>carbohydrates. <br/>
<br/>Food labels also include information about how<br/>much sugar and protein is in the food. If you are<br/>following a low-sugar diet or you're monitoring<br/>your protein intake, it's easy to spot how much of<br/>those nutrients are contained in one serving. <br/>
<br/>Vitamins, Minerals and Other Information <br/>
<br/>The light purple part of the label lists<br/>nutrients, vitamins and minerals in the food and<br/>their percent daily values. Try to average 100% DV<br/>every day for vitamins A and C, calcium, iron and<br/>fiber. Do the opposite with fat, saturated fat,<br/>sodium and cholesterol. Try to eat less than 100%<br/>DV of these. <br/>
<br/>Common Mistakes to Avoid When Reading a Food<br/>Label <br/>
<br/>Until you become accustomed to reading food<br/>labels, it's easy to become confused. Avoid these<br/>common mistakes when reading labels: <br/>
<br/>-A label may say that the food is reduced fat or<br/>reduced sodium. That means that the amount of fat<br/>or sodium has been reduced by 25% from the<br/>original product. It doesn't mean, however, that<br/>the food is low in fat or sodium. For example, if<br/>a can of soup originally had 1,000 milligrams of<br/>sodium, the reduced sodium product would still be<br/>a high-sodium food. <br/>
<br/>-Don't confuse the % DV for fat with the<br/>percentage of calories from fat. If the % DV is<br/>15% that doesn't mean that 15% of the calories<br/>comes from fat. Rather, it means that you're using<br/>up 15% of all the fat you need for a day with one<br/>serving (based on a meal plan of 2,000 calories<br/>per day). <br/>
<br/>-Don't make the mistake of assuming that the<br/>amount of sugar on a label means that the sugar<br/>has been added. For example, milk naturally has<br/>sugar, which is called lactose. But that doesn't<br/>mean you should stop drinking milk because milk is<br/>full of other important nutrients including<br/>calcium. <br/>
<br/>Reading Label Lingo <br/>
<br/>In addition to requiring that packaged foods<br/>contain a Nutrition Facts label, the FDA also<br/>regulates the use of phrases and terms used on the<br/>product packaging. Here's a list of common phrases<br/>you may see on your food packaging and what they<br/>actually mean. <br/>
<br/>No fat or fat free - Contains less than 1/2 gram<br/>of fat per serving Lower or reduced fat: Contains<br/>at least 25 percent less per serving than the<br/>reference food. (An example might be reduced fat<br/>cream cheese, which would have at least 25 percent<br/>less fat than original cream cheese.) <br/>
<br/>Low fat - Contains less than 3 grams of fat per<br/>serving. <br/>
<br/>Lite - Contains 1/3 the calories or 1/2 the fat<br/>per serving of the original version or a similar<br/>product. <br/>
<br/>No calories or calorie free - Contains less than 5<br/>calories per serving. <br/>
<br/>Low calories - Contains 1/3 the calories of the<br/>original version or a similar product. <br/>
<br/>Sugar free - Contains less than 1/2 gram of sugar<br/>per serving. <br/>
<br/>Reduced sugar - at least 25% less sugar per<br/>serving than the reference food. <br/>
<br/>No preservatives - Contains no preservatives<br/>(chemical or natural). <br/>
<br/>No preservatives added - Contains no added<br/>chemicals to preserve the product. Some of these<br/>products may contain natural preservatives. <br/>
<br/>Low sodium - Contains less than 140 mgs of sodium<br/>per serving. <br/>
<br/>No salt or salt free - Contains less than 5 mgs of<br/>sodium per serving. <br/>
<br/>High fiber - 5 g or more per serving (Foods making<br/>high-fiber claims must meet the definition for low<br/>fat, or the level of total fat must appear next to<br/>the high-fiber claim). <br/>
<br/>Good source of fiber - 2.5 g to 4.9 g. per<br/>serving. <br/>
<br/>More or added fiber - Contains at least 2.5 g more<br/>per serving than the reference food. <br/>
<br/>With a little practice, you will be able to put<br/>your new found knowledge about food labeling to<br/>work. Reassess your diet and decide what needs to<br/>be changed. Start by eliminating the foods that<br/>don't measure-up to your nutritional wants and<br/>needs, and replacing them with more nutritional<br/>substitutes. <br/>
<br/>And while you're at it, visit the FDA website and<br/>learn about the new labeling requirements,<br/>including those for "trans" fat. Like saturated<br/>fats, trans fats can raise levels of low-density<br/>lipoproteins (LDL) and increase your risk of heart<br/>disease. The "Nutrition Facts" panel on food<br/>packaging must provide this information beginning<br/>January 1, 2006, but most manufacturers will start<br/>providing it sooner.</div>
</content>
<draft xmlns="http://purl.org/atom-blog/ns#">false</draft>
</entry>
<entry xmlns="http://purl.org/atom/ns#">
<link href="https://www.blogger.com/atom/12483901/111815083680405273" rel="service.edit" title="Life is what happens while you are waiting around for directions." type="application/atom+xml"/>
<author>
<name>Uplander</name>
</author>
<issued>2005-06-07T09:25:00-04:00</issued>
<modified>2005-06-07T13:48:12Z</modified>
<created>2005-06-07T13:27:16Z</created>
<link href="http://www.dblsundog.net/Blog/2005/06/life-is-what-happens-while-you-are.html" rel="alternate" title="Life is what happens while you are waiting around for directions." type="text/html"/>
<id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12483901.post-111815083680405273</id>
<title mode="escaped" type="text/html">Life is what happens while you are waiting around for directions.</title>
<content mode="escaped" type="text/html" xml:base="http://www.dblsundog.net/Blog" xml:space="preserve">Life is what happens while you are waiting around&lt;br /&gt;for directions.&lt;br /&gt;©2005 C. R. Ellsworth&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I believe you shouldn't really complain about the&lt;br /&gt;status quo unless you have a solution, or you are just&lt;br /&gt;one of those folks who complain no matter what.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Alternative products exist beyond what Madison&lt;br /&gt;avenue promotes.  After all they are about profit&lt;br /&gt;first.  If it should happen that a compound they use&lt;br /&gt;in the manufacture of a popular product is found to&lt;br /&gt;harm it's users; have you ever heard of a company&lt;br /&gt;withdrawing a product or reformulating at their own&lt;br /&gt;cost without some ruckus raised by a consumer&lt;br /&gt;group or FDA edict brought on by a multi-million&lt;br /&gt;dollar lawsuit (The cost of which is put into the price&lt;br /&gt;foreverafter)?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I know a company that decided on their own without&lt;br /&gt;government or market or court intervention, to stop&lt;br /&gt;using DEA in their manufacturing process.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;DEA has been withdrawn in Europe from use in&lt;br /&gt;further manufacture of Personal Care Products.&lt;br /&gt;(Quite a few of my Friends are effected by this).&lt;br /&gt;Mind you not an outright BAN, but it is no longer&lt;br /&gt;allowed to be used in new Manufacture.&lt;br /&gt;The same 'Big House' Manufacturers that Market&lt;br /&gt;on a global scale have been forced to reformulate&lt;br /&gt;the products that they sell in Europe.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Rather than dump the old stuff, where do you think it&lt;br /&gt;could be marketed now until it's used up.  They&lt;br /&gt;certainly will sell reformulated products in the US&lt;br /&gt;because it's too expensive to make multiple&lt;br /&gt;formulations, (just ask Gasoline Manufacturers).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;There are Safe, Family Friendly Alternatives.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I Could go On &amp; On &amp; On.  In fact I do - If these&lt;br /&gt;conversations interest you&lt;br /&gt;I have a Blog (Wouldn't Ya Know), Blab, Blab, Blab;&lt;br /&gt;Blah, Blah, Blah.&lt;br /&gt;http://dblsundog.net/Blog&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Join Myself and other Concerned World Citizens.&lt;br /&gt;We have to live here forever, so the products we&lt;br /&gt;put on &amp; in ourselves &amp; our children should help&lt;br /&gt;extend our lives, not shorten them.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Governments only do what we tell them to do,&lt;br /&gt;and that  reluctantly.&lt;br /&gt;We can change things, after all we are the 'Market'&lt;br /&gt;in this Market Based Economy.</content>
<draft xmlns="http://purl.org/atom-blog/ns#">false</draft>
</entry>
<entry xmlns="http://purl.org/atom/ns#">
<link href="https://www.blogger.com/atom/12483901/111721615563809239" rel="service.edit" title="Excerpts From Senate Document #264" type="application/atom+xml"/>
<link href="http://dblsundog.net/Documents/Senate_Document_num_264.zip" rel="related" title="Excerpts From Senate Document #264" type="text/html"/>
<author>
<name>Uplander</name>
</author>
<issued>2005-05-27T13:45:00-04:00</issued>
<modified>2005-06-07T13:30:31Z</modified>
<created>2005-05-27T17:49:15Z</created>
<link href="http://www.dblsundog.net/Blog/2005/05/excerpts-from-senate-document-264.html" rel="alternate" title="Excerpts From Senate Document #264" type="text/html"/>
<id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12483901.post-111721615563809239</id>
<title mode="escaped" type="text/html">Excerpts From Senate Document #264</title>
<content type="application/xhtml+xml" xml:base="http://www.dblsundog.net/Blog" xml:space="preserve">
<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">Excerpts From Senate Document #264<br/>
<br/>"Some of our lands, even in a virgin state, never<br/>were well balanced in mineral content, and unhappily<br/>for us, we have been systematically robbing the poor<br/>soils and the good soils alike of the very substances<br/>necessary to health, growth, long life, and resistance<br/>to disease.<br/>
<br/>Up to the time I began experimenting, almost<br/>nothing had been done to make good the theft.  The<br/>more I studied nutritional problems and the effects<br/>of mineral deficiencies upon disease, the more<br/>plainly I saw that here lay the most direct approach<br/>to better health, and the more important it became in<br/>my mind to find a method of restoring those missing<br/>minerals to our foods."<br/>
<br/>--------------------------------------------------------<br/>
<br/>A 10-year test with rats proved that by withholding<br/>calcium they can be bred down to a third the size of<br/>those fed with an adequate amount of that mineral.<br/>Their intelligence, too, can be controlled by mineral<br/>feeding as readily as can their size, their bony<br/>structure, and their general health.<br/>
<br/>--------------------------------------------------------<br/>
<br/>The public can help; it can hasten the change. How?<br/>By demanding quality of food. By insisting that our<br/>doctors and our health departments establish<br/>scientific standards of nutritional value. The growers<br/>will quickly respond. They can put back those<br/>minerals almost overnight and by doing so they can<br/>actually make money through bigger and better<br/>crops. It is simpler to cure sick soils than sick<br/>people - which shall we choose?"<br/>
<br/>--------------------------------------------------------<br/>
<br/>[EDITOR'S NOTE: It would seem that what we<br/>chose instead was NPK, chemotherapy, prednisone,<br/>below- the knee amputations, pacemakers, bypass<br/>surgery, lift- gates and wheelchairs. One fourth of<br/>our Gross National Product (1.2 trillion dollars) is<br/>now spent on medical care, affectionately referred to<br/>(by doctors and drug reps) as "health care."]</div>
</content>
<draft xmlns="http://purl.org/atom-blog/ns#">false</draft>
</entry>
<entry xmlns="http://purl.org/atom/ns#">
<link href="https://www.blogger.com/atom/12483901/111520530110753865" rel="service.edit" title="Why don't Babies Have Dandruff?" type="application/atom+xml"/>
<link href="http://dblsundog.net" rel="related" title="Why don't Babies Have Dandruff?" type="text/html"/>
<author>
<name>Uplander</name>
</author>
<issued>2005-05-04T07:13:00-04:00</issued>
<modified>2005-05-06T10:27:20Z</modified>
<created>2005-05-04T11:15:01Z</created>
<link href="http://www.dblsundog.net/Blog/2005/05/why-dont-babies-have-dandruff.html" rel="alternate" title="Why don't Babies Have Dandruff?" type="text/html"/>
<id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12483901.post-111520530110753865</id>
<title mode="escaped" type="text/html">Why don't Babies Have Dandruff?</title>
<content mode="escaped" type="text/html" xml:base="http://www.dblsundog.net/Blog" xml:space="preserve">Why don't Babies Have Dandruff?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(Yeah, I know, some don't have much hair either but,&lt;br /&gt;bear with me here.)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Because you wouldn't dream of putting the same&lt;br /&gt;chemicals anywhere on their body that you put on your&lt;br /&gt;own hair.  So why do you put those things on yourself?**&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;While we're talking about the Chemicals you put on your&lt;br /&gt;Baby,... is that anti-freeze?&lt;br /&gt;Do any labels on your baby products mention Propylene&lt;br /&gt;Glycol?  Would you have put that on your Baby if you'd&lt;br /&gt;have known it was Ant-Freeze?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Have you thrown that out yet?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;On an Anti-Freeze Jug there is a warning to keep it a way&lt;br /&gt;from your pets.  It will Kill your Dog or Cat.&lt;br /&gt;But Baby Products Containing anti-freeze are promoted&lt;br /&gt;expecting that you will put them on your babies' skin.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;There are safe alternatives to the 'stuff' that Madison&lt;br /&gt;avenue sells you.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Why do you use Toothpaste with a poison warning on the&lt;br /&gt;label? (Check It- 'Contact Poison Control)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Their flashy gazillion dollar ads don't have time for a&lt;br /&gt;disclaimer of all the junk in them, but even if they did, it&lt;br /&gt;would be the TV/Radio equivalent of 'small print' where&lt;br /&gt;somebody with a muffled voice is talking a mile a minute.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;: OSHA has identified 884 toxic chemicals commonly used&lt;br /&gt;in personal care products.&lt;br /&gt;:: “Mainstream cosmetics and personal care products&lt;br /&gt;contain about 50 known carcinogenic ingredients.&lt;br /&gt;Many of the harmful ingredients used in personal&lt;br /&gt;care products are also used in tobacco products.”&lt;br /&gt;- Dr. Samuel Epstein, M.D. (Chairman, Cancer&lt;br /&gt;Prevention Coalition)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;**( This is only my personal observation, but I'm pretty&lt;br /&gt;sure I never had dandruff until I used (an unamed&lt;br /&gt;dandruff shampoo&amp;shoulders) because it happened to be&lt;br /&gt;all that was available while traveling.)</content>
<draft xmlns="http://purl.org/atom-blog/ns#">false</draft>
</entry>
</feed>
